April
28, 2006 --- UPTON, NY – For the first time, researchers
have directly measured the electronic structure of
individual carbon nanotubes whose physical properties
had already been determined. This new study, pioneered
by researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's
Brookhaven National Laboratory working with their
colleagues at Columbia University, may help scientists
determine the usefulness of carbon nanotubes in various
applications, from microelectronics to mechanical,
thermal, and photovoltaic devices. The researchers
report on their work in the April 28 issue of Science.
“This combined study technique allows us -- for
the first time -- to test some fundamental predictions
about nanotube behavior,” said Matt Sfeir, a physicist
in Brookhaven's Condensed Matter Physics and Materials
Sciences Division and lead author of the study. “Understanding
how these materials function on a basic level is
key to controlling and manipulating them for future
successful commercial applications.”
Carbon nanotubes are capsule-shaped molecules only
a few billionths of a meter (nanometers) in width.
In nanotube form, many materials take on useful,
unique properties, such as physical strength and
excellent conductivity. Single-walled carbon nanotubes
are the most widely investigated variety, but what
makes them so interesting also makes them very difficult
to study -- several hundred distinct species exist,
and each has dramatically different electronic properties
thought to be linked to their unique individual structure.
Sfeir
and his colleagues sought to look at both the structure
of carbon nanotubes and their corresponding electronic
properties using two existing techniques. The twist
is that the two techniques would be used on each
of the nanotubes studied, giving the researchers
a complete picture of their unique structure and
behavior as well as greater knowledge about how they “transition” from
semi-conducting to metallic in terms of their electronic
properties.
The work started at Columbia, where the single-walled
carbon nanotubes were grown freely suspended over
a slit etched into a silicon substrate. The researchers
then identified usable individual nanotubes, labeled
them, and studied them with a technique known as
resonance Rayleigh scattering. This method allows
researchers to detect the optical spectrum of light
scattered from the nanotubes and use that scattered
light to determine their electronic structure.
“The optical spectra alone, however, does not give
us sufficient information to absolutely assign electronic
transitions to the nanotubes' physical structure,” said
Sfeir. “We needed a technique that could provide
independent structural verification. Fortunately,
our colleagues in the electron microscopy group at
Brookhaven were interested in this problem as well
and were able to provide a solution - electron diffraction.”
The labeled nanotubes were brought to Brookhaven,
where physicist Tobias Beetz subjected them to electron
diffraction studies using an electron microscope.
This gave the researchers complementary data on the
nanotubes' physical structure.
“Electron diffraction is an ideal tool for determining
the exact structure of metallic and semiconducting
nanotubes,” said Beetz. “We can use this tool to
easily see if we are dealing with single-walled or
double-walled nanotubes, and we are not limited to
studying a certain nanotube diameter range as we
would be using other methods.”
After collecting these two sets of information from
many different nanotube structures, researchers were
then able, for the first time, to test theories of
nanotube electronic transitions and confirm several
assumptions made in previous models.
“One aspect we have verified is how small changes
in the pitch of the hexagons on the nanotube sidewall,
determined by how the nanotube grows, lead to systematic
deviations in the electronic behavior in both semi-conducting
and metallic structures,” said Sfeir. “This predicted
behavior, known as the “family pattern,” had never
before been directly tested, and our experimental
results place it on a solid foundation that was previously
lacking.”
This research was funded by the Office of Basic
Energy Sciences within the Department of Energy's
Office of Science, the National Science Foundation,
and the New York State Office of Science, Technology,
and Academic Research (NYSTAR).
|