HOUSTON,
Oct. 26, 2005 -- In follow-on work to last year's
groundbreaking toxicological study on water-soluble
buckyballs, researchers at Rice University's Center
for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology (CBEN)
find that water-soluble carbon nanotubes are significantly
less toxic to begin with. Moreover, the research
finds that nanotubes, like buckyballs, can be rendered
nontoxic with minor chemical modifications.
The findings come from the first toxicological studies
of water-soluble carbon nanotubes. The study, which
is available online, will be published in an upcoming
issue of the journal Toxicology Letters.
The research is a continuation of CBEN's pioneering
efforts to both identify and mitigate potential nanotechnology
risks.
"Carbon nanotubes are high-profile nanoparticles
that are under consideration for dozens of applications
in materials science, electronics and medical imaging," said
CBEN Director Vicki Colvin, the lead researcher on
the project. "For medical applications, it is reassuring
to see that the cytotoxicity of nanotubes is low
and can be further reduced with simple chemical changes."
Research has been conducted on the toxicity of carbon
nanotubes, but CBEN's is the first to examine the
cytotoxicity of water-soluble forms of the hollow
carbon molecules. In their native state, carbon nanotubes
are insoluble, meaning they are incompatible with
the water-based environment of living systems. Solubility
is a key issue for medical applications, and researchers
at Rice and elsewhere have developed processing methods
that render nanotubes soluble. In particular, scientists
are keen to exploit the fluorescent properties of
carbon nanotubes for medical diagnostics.
Nanotubes are long, hollow molecules of pure carbon
with walls just one atom thick. They are related
to buckyballs, tiny spheres of pure carbon that are
about the same diameter.
In previous studies with buckyballs, CBEN found
that even minor surface modifications could dramatically
reduce cytotoxicity. The nanotube study found similar
results. In both cases, the researchers identified
specific alterations that reduce toxicity.
Cytotoxicity refers to toxic effects on individual
cells. In cytotoxicological studies, identical cell
cultures are exposed to various forms and concentrations
of toxins. In order to compare the toxicity of different
compounds, scientists look for the concentration
-- typically measured in parts per million or parts
per billion -- of materials that lead to the death
of 50 percent of the cells in a culture within 48
hours.
In the current study, CBEN researchers exposed skin
cell cultures to varying doses of four types of water-soluble
single-walled carbon nanotubes, or SWNTs. The four
included pure, undecorated SWNTs suspended in soapy
solution and three forms of nanotubes that were rendered
soluble via the attachment of the chemical subgroups
hydrogen sulfite, sodium sulfite and carboxylic acid.
The cytotoxicity of undecorated SWNTs was 200 parts
per billion, which compares to the level of 20 parts
per billion identified last year for undecorated
buckyballs.
The modified nanotubes were non-cytotoxic. While
cell death did increase with dose concentration,
cell death never exceeded 50 percent for these compounds,
which were each tested to a level of 2,000 parts
per million. Just as with buckyballs, CBEN found
that higher degrees of surface modification led to
lower toxicity for SWNTs.
"We now have two studies on carbon nanoparticles
that show us how to make them dramatically less cytotoxic," said
CBEN Executive Director Kevin Ausman, a co-author
of the study. "In both cases, it's the same answer:
change the surfaces. This is an important demonstration
that there are general trends in biological responses
to nanoparticles."
Co-authors on the paper include graduate students
Christie Sayes, Feng Liang, Jared Hudson, Jonathan
Beach and Condell Doyle; undergraduate Joe Mendez;
research scientists Wenhua Guo and Valerie Moore;
Professor of Chemistry Edward Billups; and Jennifer
West, the Isabel C. Cameron Professor of Bioengineering,
professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering,
and director of the Institute of Biosciences and
Bioengineering.
CBEN research is funded by the National Science
Foundation.
|